![]() ![]() ![]() 5 v/ D the reverse polarity rear wave (from the acoustically small drivers) is delayed a full 180 degrees producing a 6dB peak and beyond that you end up with a multi-lobed polar mess approaching the null at. 17 * v / D with v the speed of sound (1130 feet/second) and D the path length difference between both sides of the driver to listener which is baffle width on a flat baffle. Your problem is that dipoles roll off at 6dB/octave with output matching a monopole at. I say that having heard a variety of open baffle setups (and built Linkwitz Orions) including a $40,000 pair of Feastrex field-coil drivers with and without woofers on Nelson Pass's big baffles (Nelson is a super cool guy and analog whiz but that's not enough to crutch a flawed concept into acceptable sound). 22cm and 5mm Xmax is a good start to reach a conventional sub-woofer). ![]() Good sounding open baffle speakers take at least a couple drivers and baffle widths, equalization, and ample displacement (which you don't get from full-range drivers, especially small ones. ![]() However I'd still like them to sound reasonable if possible. Their not intended to be a serious pair of speakers, just a bit of fun and to practice my woodworking. I'm basically making a small pair of full range, open baffle speakers. Hello, got a few questions about a little project I'm working on. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |